August 2009 Edition of The Lucas Letter – 1.5 Contact Hours
FL Provider # CE82 FL Course # DTN2389944 8181 - General Continuing Education
The case-in-chief, Huntington v. Riggs, Indiana 2007, resurrects the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence in the State of Indiana after a long "winter’s-nap," so to speak. Acquiescence is alive and well in Indiana and the Court refreshes this doctrine for the new millennium. In addition to the case-in-chief, we have included as a bonus Wingler v. Simpson, Indiana 1884; Adams v. Betz, Indiana 1906; Bubacz v. Kirk, Indiana 1930; and Freiburger v. Fry, Indiana 1982. These bonus cases along with the case-in-chief constitute the essential opinions under Indiana law on the doctrine of acquiescence. No Indiana surveyor (or any other surveyor) should be without these essential cases on acquiescence. This is a Correspondence Course with a 2-Page Letter covering 1 Court Opinion consisting of 11 pages. This 28-Page document (including bonus cases) has a 10-Question examination based on the text of the newsletter and the case-in-chief. The bonus cases are not tested.
OBJECTIVES: To enhance professional competency and improve practitioner’s knowledge of the law as it relates to the practice of land surveying.
Once you purchase this item through PayPal, you will receive a receipt number and an option to RETURN TO LUCASANDCOMPANY.COM. Please make sure you click the link to RETURN TO LUCASANDCOMPANY.COM. Once you return to www.lucasandcompany.com, you will be able to download this product.