September 2008 Edition of The Lucas Letter – 3.0 Contact Hours
FL Provider # CE82 FL Course # DTN2390677 8195 - General Continuing Education
The case-in-chief is Elton v. Davis, Missouri 2003, involving the interpretation of a metes and bounds deed description where the deed doesn’t match the improvements. The secondary and supporting case is Hall v. Staley, North Carolina 2003, where parol evidence became the deciding factor in the proper interpretation of an ambiguous deed. This is a Correspondence Course with a 3-Page Letter covering 2 Court Opinions consisting of 9 pages. This 12-Page document has a 10-Question examination based on the text of the newsletter and the attached cases.
OBJECTIVES: To enhance professional competency and improve practitioner’s knowledge of the law as it relates to the practice of land surveying.
Once you purchase this item through PayPal, you will receive a receipt number and an option to RETURN TO LUCASANDCOMPANY.COM. Please make sure you click the link to RETURN TO LUCASANDCOMPANY.COM. Once you return to www.lucasandcompany.com, you will be able to download this product.